Thursday, December 17, 2009

White House Shows Its True Colors on Healthcare Reform

After appearing asleep at the wheel during much of the healthcare debates, the White House is now passionately advocating passage of a Senate bill that betrays many of President Obama's campaign promises. The bill, if passed, would force people to purchase health insurance. The bill, however, does not contain measures like the public plan option or a Medicare buy-in that Democrats -- including Obama -- have long advocated as ways of increasing competition and making health insurance affordable.

According to several media reports, Rahm Emanuel instructed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to remove the public option and Medicare buy-in to appease Senator Joe Lieberman, who threatened to filibuster the bill. Lieberman, however, is probably a scapegoat.

Left Critiques of the Senate Bill
Several liberals commentators have condemned the Senate bill. Howard Dean, a medical doctor and a veteran advocate of healthcare reform, wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post which contends that the watered-down bill does not represent "real reform." Dean criticizes the removal of the public plan and Medicare buy-in provisions because he believes that the measures could reduce insurance premiums. Although Dean says he would not vote for the bill in its current format, he believes that Senators can improve it.

Furthermore, while many political commentators have focused on Lieberman's filibuster threats, Bernie Sanders, a Senator from Vermont, has threatened to withhold support for the Senate bill as well. Sanders, who, like Lieberman, is an Independent, says that the removal of the public plan option caused him to oppose the measure.

White House Bashes Liberals
With liberals voicing strong opposition to the measure, the White House, which has often appeared indifferent on the specifics of healthcare reform, has heated up its rhetoric. Yesterday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Dean was not acting rationally by opposing the bill. Today, White House Senior Advisor David Axelrod (who also ran Obama's presidential campaign) said that liberal opponents of the Senate bill are "insane."

Axelrod's argument, like Gibbs' claim, rests on an erroneous conclusion. Both men apparently believe that the public must either accept the watered-down Senate bill or abandon healthcare reform altogether. But liberals seek a viable alternative option -- pursuing more substantive and rational reform than the current bill offers.

My take: Liberals were actually "irrational" and "insane" for believing that the Obama Administration would deliver dramatic liberal reforms. I have made this argument repeatedly on this blog (see here, here, here and here, for example). To date, the administration of "change" has given hundreds billions of dollars to banks and corporate America and is about to offer a boon to insurance companies by mandating individual coverage without increasing competition and reducing costs. The more things change, the more they look the same.

See also: Rahm Emanuel Tells Liberals To Kiss His Arse


Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

If someone from the WH describes Landrieu or Lieberman as "irrational" or "insane," please let me know!

Sue said...

Darren I have been writing and rewriting a post similar to yours all day, you gave me the push I needed to finish it!

Landrieu and LIEbermann make me puke, I am tired of the obstructionists and also tired of Obamas denial of the whole sordid mess!

Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

Hi, Sue. I was reluctant to believe in the possiblity of substantial healthcare reform, until I saw the public support for it. The Democrats' refusal to follow the public will is astonishing.

mcallen3 said...

As a conservative, old, white hetro male even I'm finding it jaw-dropping that progressives are letting themselves be marginalized on the health issue. Clearly, Obama does not care about health reform, only claiming he got a bill passed. Even Clinton was not so cynical.

Here we have a bill that eschews even very popular reforms like easing import restrictions in favor of pandering to large corporate interests. The bill actually makes illegal every reform, market-based or command/control, that might reduce costs. And yet, many progressives still support it.

This is like the Republicans that supported Nixon's imposition of wage and price controls. They sold out to political expediency and in the process did enormous harm their own cause.

Leslie Parsley said...

Face it, we Democrats have been had by our own party "leaders." And don't you know that the right-wing is lapping it up.

First time I've visited here. I like it.

Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

Hi, Leslie: Thanks for visiting. I think both parties move to the center and lose the ideological left and right. What makes this moment odd, however, is that the public actually agrees with the left on this issue. Obama is supporting Lieberman -- who is not even following the will of voters in his home state -- while bashing liberals.

Mcallen: I am not sure that progressives are going down without a fight. We shall see.

Leslie Parsley said...

BTW, I forgot to add that I linked here from Sue's place.

The outcome will be interesting, so being tired of shouting and listening to shouting, I'm just putting my thoughts on hold for now.

Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

Sue's got a great blog! I had my thoughts on hold too -- if only for professional reasons (exams, grading, etc). I am able to dig in to the issue, because I took a needed break for a week.

Sue said...

I appreciate that Darren, as I think about a follower who just left me, Hmmmmm wonder why.....

Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

Sue: followers come and go. Fortunately, a lot of them remain!

Shane Boulton said...

Great informative post thanks for sharing..... online legal services degree | health science degree

Real Time Analytics