Friday, September 18, 2009

Media Is More Interested in Rightwing Racism Than Rightwing Distortion, Deception, Lies, and Hypocrisy

I am a law professor who teaches Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Race and the Law and other areas related to equality. I have spent nearly two decades researching and writing about race relations and public policy. With respect to the rightwing attacks on President Obama, however, I find the issue of race largely uninteresting.

I think it is safe to say that most Tea Party marchers, rightwingers, Joe Wilson, and many other anti-Obama types are not progressive on issues of race. Indeed, many of the participants in the protest marches have carried signs or made statements that show racial hostility. So -- yes -- some of Obama's critics harbor racial bias.

Nevertheless, it is impossible to psychoanalyze the entire opposition to Obama. Discussing this issue will do nothing but take the public's attention away from more important public policy concerns. Race is definitely an important social, political and legal concern, and the issue of race and access to healthcare is extremely important. But in this setting, there are far more pressing matters than the racial motivation of Obama's opponents.

Furthermore, even though racism informs some of the opposition to Obama, rightwingers have exhibited lunactic opposition to liberal and even moderate policies in the past (think Bill Clinton). Glenn Greenwald (of Salon) and I have both analyzed this topic.

What to Talk About Instead of Race
For over a month, conservatives have advanced gross distortions regarding healthcare reform. They have described it as socialism, Nazism, and totalitarianism, and they have argued that it would establish "death panels" to decide whether to "pull the plug on grandma." They have portrayed healthcare reform as an effort to harm seniors -- even though Republican John McCain proposed the very same cuts to Medicare that Obama has proposed. They have also condemned "government-run" healthcare, while pretending to support Medicare and TRICARE; these two programs, however, are forms of government-run healthcare.

Moreover, many of Obama's opponents have blasted "big government," but they want the federal government to reform tort laws in every state and to veto a doctor and patient's decision regarding abortion. Many of them also supported the unnecessary war in Iraq and the increasingly unpopular war in Afghanistan. They also endorse governmental regulation of some of the most intimate human relations, such as sex among consenting adults.

Conservatives blame Obama for the financial sector and auto industry bailouts -- even though the Bush administration proposed both bailouts and ushered the legislation through Congress. Bush also sharply increased the rate of government spending -- while cutting taxes. That disastrous fiscal policy turned a surplus into a record deficit.

I am not even intrigued by Joe "You Lie" Wilson's racial mindset. His prior work for Strom Thurmond and his reaction to the "unseemly" possibility that Thurmond had a "black" daughter indicate that Wilson is not the most advanced mind on issues of race and sex. But focusing on this obvious fact detracts from the content of Wilson's own "lies."

Wilson, for example, has rallied his conservative constituents against the inclusion of a public plan option in healthcare reform. Wilson makes typical Republican arguments regarding this issue, claiming that a public plan would interfere with doctor and patient relationships and reduce the level and quality of care. Wilson, however, has spoken quite fondly of TRICARE -- the government-run health system for military personnel, veterans and their families. Wilson and his children and their families are all on TRICARE. Wilson has said that TRICARE delivers "world class" medical care. Wilson has also noted that TRICARE receives high marks from participants.

TRICARE also establishes treatment options (just like private insurance) that define the contours of a doctor-patient relationship for patients who lack private insurance or the ability to self-pay. Wilson's contradictory positions on this subject are far more important than whether he hates Obama because he is black.

The issue of race has become the latest nonpolicy distraction for the media. Earlier, the media covered violence and mayhem at healthcare town hall discussions -- rather than the substance of reform. It then covered the conflicts between moderate and liberal Democrats (rather than the substance of reform). Now, it is exploring whether the opposition to Obama is racist (rather than the substance of reform).

Here's a thought: Analyze the substance of reform -- rather than the subjective emotions that shape its opposition. The media cannot tell us whether most of Obama's opponents are racist, but it can certainly unveil the hypocritical and deceitful nature of that opposition.


Sue said...

you always get us thinking Darren, great post. The right always cries MSM is biased towards the left, but this doesn't seem so to me. Look how everything negative is on the news but you don't see reporting about the hundreds of thousands who are fighting for reform, who do stand with the president and agree with his policies. I just have to believe the majority in this country does want change, and the tiny wingnut minority want you to believe otherwise.

Kansas City said...

I don't think opposition to proposed health care legislation has much to do with race, but I also don't think it is the media that it to blame for the focus on race.

Many democrats and liberals are raising it and a former democratic president has said it in very stong terms (without citing any evidence to support it).

I think Carter is an exampe of a person who probably has good intentions, but I think he repeatedly demonstrates poor judgment. I remember long ago hearing him say that Sadat was okay after he had been assassinated, and I thought to myself how he had exercised bad judgment in speaking about something like that without reliable information. His approval of the disastrous Iranian hostage plan is another example. And now, through the years, he has consistently lined up with Chavez, Castro, Palestinian leaders, etc., showing bad judgment every time.

Here, he stated in very essagerated terms his "judgment" about racial motivation. Even if he had some basis to claim that (which he doesn't), it seems that good judgment would call for him to keep his opinion to himself. A former president casting racial aspertions on millions is not healthy for the country.

Darren Lenard Hutchinson said...

Sorry KC, but your post implies that the media lacks agency. Liberals have pointed out the lies, distortions, etc., related to the protests; in fact, they did this long before raising the question of race. They refuse to deal with the substance of healthcare reform. I am beginning to think they lack the capacity to do so.

I actually think a substantial number of protesters have scary views on race. I believe that focusing on that in this instance will only prolong the lack of attention to substance regarding healthcare reform. Ultimately, that will not help racial justice.

bigc said...

But Darren, based upon you writings (on your faculty page), you've been obsessed with race your entire career and it appears to form the basis of your legal scholarship. If you're always looking for racism/racial injustice, etc. you're bound to find it under every stone. Also, there are lots of lies that the Right has uncovered, and it is perfectly consistent and legitimate to advocate for tort reform, which will objectively help reduce the cost of health care, and to be against nationalized healthcare. Litigation in this country is out-of-control by any standard. While I understand that, being a liberal and Obama supporter, you are for nationalized healthcare, there are enough lies and hypocrisy to go around to both sides. And, just because someone disagrees with President Obama, that in no way shape or form means that person is a racist.

Real Time Analytics